Llama 4 is Here, and It's an Absolute Unit

Apr 5, 2025
4 min to read
AI
LLM
llama
Meta
OpenAI
Anthropic

VibeCoding: Revolutionizing Software Development or Just a Passing Trend?

Meta just dropped Llama 4, and if you're like me, someone who's been tracking LLMs from their GPT-2 infancy through transformer puberty, this one's worth your time.

Yes, another frontier model. But this time, it's not just hype. Llama 4 is a serious engineering leap, and it's gunning for the top spot in open-weight, state-of-the-art AI.

Let's unpack why it matters.

Architected for Scale MoE Done Right

What sets Llama 4 apart isn't just size, it's design.

Meta has gone all-in on a Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture. That means not all neurons fire every time (finally some energy-efficient brains out here). Instead, a router selects the right expert subnetworks to handle a task. This allows Meta to scale Llama 4 to trillions of parameters (yes, with a 'T'), but only activate ~10-20% at runtime.

TL;DR: You get the scale and specialization of a 2T+ model, with the inference efficiency of something much leaner.

This is transformer modularity in action. It's how DeepMind's GShard and Google's Switch Transformer blazed trails, but Meta brought it to the open-weight world.

What Changed from Llama 3?

Llama 3 was solid. Trained on 15T tokens, it pushed open-source forward.

But Llama 4 is a different beast:

| Feature | Llama 3 | Llama 4 | | ------- | ------- | ------- | | Params | Up to 65B (dense) | 400B+ effective, MoE (2T planned) | | Context Length | 128K tokens | 10M tokens (nearly 80x increase!) | | Modality Support | Text only | Multimodal: Text + Vision (Audio coming) | | Architecture | Dense Transformer | MoE, sparse routing | | Math/Reasoning | Decent | Much better (approaching GPT-4) | | Availability | Open weights (select) | Open weights (more permissive) |

Llama 4 doesn't just increment, it evolves the architecture to unlock a new efficiency frontier. It's what you'd expect if GPT-4 and Chinchilla had a baby raised by Anthropic.

Massive Context Window: A Game-Changer

Perhaps the most revolutionary aspect of Llama 4 is its unprecedented 10 million token context window. This isn't just an incremental improvement—it represents an entirely new paradigm for AI applications.

With this context capacity, Llama 4 can:

  • Ingest and reason across entire codebases
  • Process lengthy legal documents and contracts in a single pass
  • Maintain coherent, book-length conversations without forgetting early interactions
  • Analyze massive datasets without chunking or losing semantic connections

The 10M context window makes Llama 4 the clear leader in long-context processing, dwarfing GPT-4's 128K and Claude 3's 200K windows.

Meta's Not Playing

Meta didn't stumble into this. They've gone all-in on infra and research:

  • $65B investment in compute, including 1.3 million H100s planned for 2025.
  • Clara Shih (ex-Salesforce AI) hired to lead Business AI, big signal Meta wants real enterprise traction.
  • Internal projects like Stargate aiming to unify AI infra and agentic workflows.
  • AI agents for Messenger, Instagram, and WhatsApp powered by Llama 4 are already in pilot.

This isn't just a science project. It's Meta's foundation model for agents, search, creation, and more.

How Does It Stack Up?

I've tested early Llama 4 variants across reasoning-heavy benchmarks, coding prompts, and agent flows. Here's what I saw:

  • Chain-of-thought reasoning? Beats Gemini 2.5 (preview) and Claude 3 Opus on several prompts.
  • Multimodal understanding (via Llama 4-vision)? Surprisingly accurate, especially in diagram QA and document parsing.
  • Coding ability? Way ahead of OpenAI's O3 models, leagues better than Llama 3 and Mistral 7B.
  • Inference speed (with 8-bit quantization)? Really solid thanks to the sparse expert routing.
  • Long-context processing? Absolutely unmatched with its 10M token window, maintaining coherence across massive documents.

Is it better than OpenAI's Omni models and Google's Gemini across the board? Not sure. But is it the best open-weight LLM today? Undoubtedly yes.

Why It Matters for Engineers

If you're building…

  • Enterprise copilotsLlama 4's reasoning + MoE scaling makes it ideal for high-load workloads.
  • Knowledge graphs or embeddings → The open weights + strong embeddings make it a great fit for vector DBs and RAG.
  • Custom fine-tunes or agents → You get access to internals. No black box API.
  • Document processing systems → The 10M context window lets you process entire books, codebases, or legal documents in a single pass.
  • Long-running assistants → Maintain conversation history across days or weeks without context truncation.

And with Meta open-sourcing most of the stack, including tokenizer, inference server, and training infra. you're not just using a model. You're owning it.

Final Thoughts: Llama 4 is the Real One 🐐

We've seen a wave of new models this year, OpenAI's o3, Claude 3.7, Gemini 2.5, Mistral Mixtral, but Llama 4 is the first open-weight model that makes me rethink GPT-4 as the de facto default.

It's not just impressive, it's usable, hackable, and scalable. And with a 10M token context window, it's opening doors to applications that were previously impossible. If you're building AI infra or shipping products that need reasoning at scale, you need to try this.

Stay tuned. Meta's planning a 2-trillion parameter model soon, and you can bet that'll push the frontier even further.